<< Click to Display Table of Contents >> Navigation: »No topics above this level« The 3-step system: Triage, assessment and matched intervention |
This section now focuses on how to apply this model in practice through screening, assessment, and intervention strategies.
Clarifying key concepts: screening, triage, and assessment
The 3-step system of psychosocial matched care follows a structured process to identify and address psychosocial risk factors. However, terms like screening, triage, and assessment are sometimes confused.
Table 4 below clarifies these steps before we explore their implementation in detail.
Table 4 - Screening vs. triage vs. assessment
Process |
Purpose |
Who It Applies To? |
Tools Used |
Outcome |
Screening |
Quick initial check to identify potential psychosocial risks. |
All injured workers within first 1-2 weeks of claim. |
Short-form tools (e.g., ÖMPSQ-SF, AB-5). |
Classifies worker as “low risk” or “elevated risk” for delayed recovery. |
Triage |
Sorting process to determine who needs further assessment or intervention. |
Workers classified as “elevated risk” in screening. |
Screening scores + case manager decision-making. |
Decision: Proceed to full psychosocial assessment OR no further action needed. |
Psychosocial assessment |
In-depth evaluation of the worker’s specific barriers to recovery. |
Only workers at “elevated risk” who require further support. |
Questionnaire tools (e.g., DASS-21, ARI, PSEQ, Workplace Perceptions Survey). |
Identifies barriers and determines the matched care intervention. |