WISE Protocol

<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Navigation:  Implementation case studies >

WISE Protocol

Research-based implementation

Facet

Description

Program outline

The Work Injury Screening and Early intervention (WISE) [16] study was a trial conducted across 17 public hospitals (intervention and control hospitals) in New South Wales, Australia. It involved early identification of injured workers at high risk of delayed recovery/return to work (RTW) and provided early intervention by clinicians and the workplace.

 

 

Initial screening / triage

Screening tool: 10-item Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ-SF)

Method: Administered over the phone by insurance case manager within 1-3 weeks of claim notification

Protocol: Workers scoring ≥50/100 on ÖMPSQ-SF were identified as high risk and offered the early intervention protocol
 

Matched care intervention

1.Overall system:

High-risk workers offered assessment with designated psychologist

Early review by Occupational Physician

Regular contact between worker, RTW coordinator, GP, and insurance case manager, as needed with psychologist

2.Psychosocial counselling:

Up to 6 weekly sessions with psychologist

Focus on psychosocial barriers to RTW

Brief, present problem-focused interventions

3.Extra healthcare support:

Early review by IMC Occupational Physician (4-6 weeks post-injury),

Contact with GP and sharing of report

4.Extra workplace support:

RTW coordinator addressed workplace issues

Regular contact with worker and their supervisor

5.Case manager's role:

Administered screening

Arranged Occupational Physician review

Coordinated with other stakeholders
 

Training and Capacity Building

1.Training provided to RTW coordinators, case managers, and psychologists on the WISE protocol

2.Psychologists trained in brief, problem-focused cognitive-behavioural interventions with RTW focus

3.Regular review meetings with RTW coordinators
 

Outcome measures

Pre-post questionnaires: ÖMPSQ-SF, DASS-21, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS)

RTW outcomes: Days of work lost over 2 years

Cost outcomes: Total claim costs

 

 

Continuous Quality Improvement

Regular meetings of steering committee to review progress and address difficulties

Ongoing monitoring by Research/Implementation Manager

Feedback from participating hospitals led to protocol modifications and wider implementation

Claim cost growth plateaued for the intervention group around 9–11 months, whereas it continued rising for controls group.  

 

 

Results

1.Return to Work (RTW) Rates:

The intervention group had significantly fewer lost work days compared to the control group over 2 years (32 days vs 67 days)

By 3 months post-injury, 94% of the intervention group had returned to work, compared to 81% of the control group

 

2.Cost Outcomes:

At 24 months, the mean total costs for the intervention group were $16,443 compared to $23,405 for the control group, a 30% reduction

The intervention group's costs plateaued at around 9-11 months, while the control group's costs continued to rise

 

3.Psychological Outcomes:

Significant improvements were observed in all psychological measures after treatment:

ÖMPSQ-SF scores reduced from high-risk (mean 59) to low-risk range (mean 35)

Improvements in depression, anxiety, stress (DASS), disability (BPI), pain self-efficacy (PSEQ), and pain catastrophising (PCS) with large effect sizes

 

4.Long-term Outcomes:

By 30 months post-injury, all intervention group participants had returned to work

Control group participants were still experiencing intermittent work absences up to 45 months post-injury

 

5.Other Outcomes:

Reduced variability in outcomes for the intervention group, suggesting more predictable and consistent results

Improved working relationships between workplace and claims teams for the intervention hospitals

Positive feedback from injured workers about the early intervention approach

High acceptability of the protocol, with all participating hospitals choosing to continue using it after the study

 

System-wide Impact:

Based on the success of the trial, NSW Health implemented the WISE protocol as "Business as Usual" from July 2015 (though the program was degraded after the new model of claims management was introduced with the transition to the icare

The protocol was extended to all public hospitals across the state